Reload bonus UK online casinos in 2026: ten licensed brands compared on cost

A reload bonus is the offer that lands in an existing account, not the welcome one that greeted it. At a UK-licensed online casino it shares the same regulatory cage as the welcome package: it counts as a gambling promotion, so it carries a wagering requirement that has been capped at 10x since 19 December 2025, it sits behind the same age and identity checks, and it goes quiet the moment a player is on GAMSTOP. The thing that separates it from the welcome bonus is timing — a reload is designed to be claimed again, and again, which is what makes it worth examining on its own terms rather than as a smaller version of the first deposit deal.

This page looks at reload bonuses the way a player who has already signed up should: at the deposit that triggers them, the wagering that stands between bonus and withdrawal, and the actual cost in time and money of clearing them. The lens is cost — what each offer takes out of a bankroll before any of it is withdrawable — because reload promotions are sold as free extras and almost never are.

Data current as of 7 November 2026 and verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses.

How UK licensing shapes every reload offer on this page

A reload bonus at a British-licensed casino is, first, a Gambling Commission matter. The Commission is the regulator under the Gambling Act 2005, sponsored by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and it covers Great Britain — England, Scotland and Wales — rather than Northern Ireland. Since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 any operator taking customers in Great Britain needs a Commission licence wherever it is based; a Curaçao, Maltese or Gibraltar licence is not a substitute. The Commission licenses remote casino activity as a distinct category, and on 18 September 2026 its public register listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence. The register is freely searchable, downloadable in full as CSV or Excel, and is the whole test of whether a brand is licensed — if the brand is not on it, it is not licensed for GB customers, whatever its footer claims.

The register pairs each website with the licence account that runs it, recording a status of Active, Inactive or White Label. A white-label site trades under another company’s licence, which is how a single licence number can carry several familiar-looking domains. The register held 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries on 18 September 2026. Each licence number follows the form of account-R-number-suffix, where the leading six digits repeat the licence holder’s account number and the R marks a remote (online) licence. So bet365’s domain sits on the register under operating licence 055149-R-331499-004, and the same shape applies to every other operator named on this page.

This matters for reload offers because the cap that now governs them — 10x wagering, in force from 19 December 2025 — is a Commission rule, not a brand’s voluntary restraint. A British-licensed casino cannot run a 30x or 40x reload offer even if it wanted to. The cap is the floor of the cost story this page is built on; the rest of the cost is in the offer itself.

Incentives in the register: 139 licences, ten featured brands

The Commission’s register is wider than any one article can cover. It listed 139 such businesses as of 18 September 2026, with 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries sitting beneath them. The ten brands featured on this page are sampled from that register, not the whole of it, and every licence cited below is one a reader can look up directly. None of them carries an exclusivity claim: many other licensed reload operators exist, and a licence register always lists more brands than any article features.

What the register does not tell a player is anything about the reload offer a brand is running this week — that lives on the operator’s own promotion page and is what the rest of this article examines.

The funding rules reload bonuses inherit

A reload bonus arrives with the same funding constraints as every other promotion on a licensed site. The most consequential is the credit-card ban that has been in force since 14 April 2020: no credit card, including a credit card routed through an e-wallet, can fund gambling in Great Britain. Debit cards and bank transfers are unaffected, and that is the baseline for the deposits the rest of this article discusses. The Commission’s evidence base for the ban cited around 800,000 UK consumers using credit cards to gamble in 2018, with 22% of online gamblers who used credit cards classed as problem gamblers.

Bank transfers within the UK typically move through the Faster Payments Service, launched in 2008 and operated by the national payment system administrator. The service runs around the clock, and most payments arrive instantly or within a couple of minutes, though transfers can occasionally take up to two hours. The scheme itself sets a £1,000,000 per-transaction limit; individual banks can and do impose lower limits on their customers. The Bank of England is not a direct participant but oversees the system’s safety and stability and provides final settlement. For most reload deposits Faster Payments is the path a bank transfer takes, and it is the path where time is most often lost — the two-hour tail rather than the instant head.

Apple Pay sits in the same legal space as a debit card for gambling-funding purposes: it protects card data through tokenisation, replacing the actual card number with a device-specific tokenised Device Primary Account Number and generating a dynamic security code for each transaction, and it uses near-field communication for in-store purchases. Apple launched the service on 20 October 2014 with US-issued cards only; UK-issued cards were added on 14 July 2015. Authentication on an iPhone with Face ID is a double-click of the side button; on a Touch ID model, a double-click of the Home button. Apple’s own support pages make clear that a supported card from a participating card issuer is required, and Apple Pay is not available in all markets. None of that changes the fact that, for a UK-licensed casino reload deposit, an Apple Pay transaction is funded by the underlying debit card and is not the equivalent of a credit card.

AstroPay sits on the other side of that line: it operates as a global digital wallet offering online payments, virtual and physical debit cards, and peer-to-peer transfers. It was founded in 2009, is headquartered in Uruguay, and spun off its payment-processing business, dLocal, as a separate company in 2016. The group’s UK entity, Larstal Limited, is an electronic money institution authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011. AstroPay’s Brazilian entity is authorised by the Brazilian Central Bank as an electronic currency issuer; its Danish entity by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority; its Isle of Man entity by the Isle of Man Financial Services Authority. Where AstroPay is accepted as a reload deposit method at a GB-licensed casino, it is the wallet’s e-money authorisation that sits behind the funds — not a credit line.

What this means for the deposit step

A reload offer is only triggered by a deposit, and the deposit is constrained by the same rules as any other funding path on the site. Credit cards are out. Bank transfers are usually Faster Payments, fast on average but with a long tail. Apple Pay is functionally a debit card. AstroPay is an e-money wallet. A player who plans a reload round needs to know which path is fast enough to count as a single deposit and which is slow enough to risk a promotion window closing mid-transfer.

The 10x cap and what it costs the player

Since 19 December 2025 a wagering requirement on any reload bonus at a UK-licensed casino is capped at 10x. The cap sits alongside the ban on mixed-product bonuses that came in the same package: a player can no longer receive, say, a sports bet that pays out in casino spins, because the casino portion would inherit a wagering multiple from a non-casino product.

The arithmetic is the heart of what a reload actually costs. For any reload bonus, the required turnover is the bonus amount multiplied by the wagering factor. At the 10x cap, a £20 reload bonus demands £200 of wagering; a £50 reload bonus demands £500; a £100 reload bonus demands £1,000. From there the time cost depends on the size of stake a player chooses. At the maximum slot stake for an adult — £5 per game cycle from 9 April 2025 — the £200 turnover is 40 spins. The £500 turnover is 100 spins. The £1,000 turnover is 200 spins.

That figure does not say what the reload bonus is worth. The figure says what it takes.

A practical reload-deposit band, on the assumption that the player wagers only the bonus amount and clears it at the maximum slot stake, runs as follows:

• A £20 reload at the 10x cap requires £200 of turnover, which is roughly 40 spins at £5 and a session under an hour.
• A £50 reload at the 10x cap requires £500 of turnover, which is roughly 100 spins at £5 and a session of about seven minutes at the absolute floor and around half an hour in practice.
• A £100 reload at the 10x cap requires £1,000 of turnover, which is roughly 200 spins at £5 and a session in the hour range.

The band is the practical answer to “how long does it take to clear a reload bonus”, and the only honest framing of it is as a band rather than a single figure. A player who bets smaller stakes stretches the time; a player who bets larger stakes compresses it, with the £5 ceiling as the outer bound. A player who has to interrupt the session to sleep or to make a second deposit has, in fact, added to the cost — and reload offers are precisely the offers that ask for repeat deposits. The session length is the cost the marketing line “free bonus” never mentions.

A reload promotion that asks the player to deposit twice in a week is a reload promotion whose true wagering cost is two £200-or-more turnover windows back to back. The cap of 10x is the regulatory ceiling; the multiplication is in the design.

The stake limits that govern the arithmetic

The slot stake limits introduced in 2025 sit on top of the 10x cap. From 9 April 2025 the maximum stake per game cycle for players aged 25 and over is £5; from 21 May 2025 the maximum stake for players aged 18 to 24 is £2. The Commission defines a game cycle as a single spin, and a slot spin may not be faster than 2.5 seconds. Both limits apply to every GB-licensed casino; neither applies to an offshore site. Auto-play has been banned since 31 October 2021, which is why a session length cannot be compressed below the 2.5-second floor.

The age-tiered stake limit is the reason the time band above is wider than the maths alone suggests. A 21-year-old clearing a £50 reload at 10x has to do it at £2 a spin, which is 250 spins and roughly double the time of the same bonus cleared at £5. A 30-year-old can do it at £5, 100 spins. The same bonus carries different time costs on either side of the 25th birthday, and the operator’s terms page is the only place this distinction is recorded.

Budget pressure and the responsible-gaming frame

Reload offers exist to bring a returning depositor back to the cashier. That is the design, and it is why the responsible-gaming frame is not an optional addendum here — it is the thing a reload offer tests. The Commission’s safer-gambling rules have piled up over the past five years. Every licensed online operator must take part in GAMSTOP, the national online self-exclusion scheme, since 31 March 2020; periods run six months, one year or five years, and a self-exclusion cannot be cancelled early. Financial vulnerability checks run at £150 net deposits in a rolling 30 days — in force from 28 February 2025, using public data only. Operators must prompt a customer to set a financial limit before the first deposit, a rule in force from 31 October 2025; there is no state-set deposit or loss ceiling, only the operator’s own prompt. Wider financial risk assessments have been announced but are not yet in force.

The combination is the responsible-gaming test the reload offer is built to pass. GAMSTOP blocks a self-excluded player from the front door. The 30-day £150 vulnerability check is what catches a player who has slipped past that front door without registering, on a roll-up of net deposits. The financial-limit prompt is what makes the second, third and fourth deposit a deliberate act with a figure attached to it. None of those mechanisms stops a player who has decided to claim a £100 reload this week and a £100 reload next week; what they do is make each reload deposit a counted event with a paper trail.

The help routes the licensed frame offers are real and named: GamCare runs the National Gambling Helpline; GambleAware funds treatment and education. A player who feels the reload is pulling them toward more deposits than they meant to make is using the same licensed frame the regulator built — and the offshore alternative carries none of it.

The offshore caveat, once

Offshore brands that take GB customers without a UK licence are operating illegally under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005. The Commission disrupts them — cease-and-desist notices, search-engine delisting, payment and hosting referrals — but has no ISP-blocking power. No penalty is aimed at the player. What the player loses on an unlicensed site is protection: no GAMSTOP, no Commission complaints route, no approved ADR. The offshore caveat applies once on this page. Every brand named below is licensed.

The offers themselves: what the ten brands run

The ten brands below are reviewed under the same lens as the rest of the article: the deposit a reload expects, the wagering a reload demands, and what the offer actually delivers once the 10x cap has done its work. The shared frame is the regulatory one; what differs brand to brand is the scale of the offer, the trigger, and the conditions attached. Three of the ten (Ladbrokes, Coral and Gala Bingo) sit under LC International Limited on the same operating licence, which means the offer at one is not independent of the offer at another — they share a compliance team, a payments stack and a promotions engine. They are presented as separate brands because that is how they are presented to a player, and the reload terms at each of them can differ; the licence behind them does not.

The frame for every brand is the same: the Gambling Commission’s register, the 10x wagering cap, the slot stake limits, the GAMSTOP requirement, the credit-card ban. The differences live in the offer, not the cage it sits in.

1. Paddy Power — the longest-running reload cadence

Paddy Power sits on the Commission’s register as an active domain of account 39411, PPB Games Limited, under remote casino operating licence 039411-R-319335-010. The licence account has been active for years and is one of the older entries on the register; the brand has been running reload-style promotions in some form for almost as long. The reload offer a returning player meets is typically a weekly or monthly percentage match on a deposit of £10 or more, with the wagering at or near the 10x cap that has been the regulatory ceiling since 19 December 2025. The deposit triggers are on the low end of the featured set, which is what makes a Paddy Power reload accessible to a small bankroll — and what makes it easy to trigger repeatedly.

A £20 deposit matched at, say, 50% gives a £10 bonus with £100 of wagering to clear, in roughly 20 spins at the £5 ceiling. The brand has the size and the licence tenure to take a long view on a returning customer, which usually shows up in the cadence rather than the headline match percentage. Paddy Power is a strong choice for players needing a low-deposit reload they can run weekly without long sessions; the smaller bonus size keeps costs strictly in check.

2. Ladbrokes — share-and-share-alike with Coral and Gala Bingo

Ladbrokes operates as a domain of account 54743, LC International Limited, under remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. The same licence carries Coral and Gala Bingo. The reload offers across the three brands are run by the same promotions engine, with the headline match and the qualifying deposit calibrated to each brand’s audience rather than each brand’s licence — but the wagering is the same 10x cap, and the deposit triggers are in the same band.

A Ladbrokes reload is typically a percentage match on a deposit of £10 or more, with the wagering at the 10x cap and the qualifying games restricted to slots. The shared-licence reality means the player gets the same regulatory protections across all three brands, and the same broad offer shape; the difference is in the brand-level promotional calendar and the stake ceilings a player imposes on themselves. Ladbrokes serves as a reliable option for those wanting a reload backed by a well-tenured operator; it mirrors Coral and Gala Bingo, so the best choice depends on which brand’s loyalty programme you already use.

3. MrQ — the small-catalogue, house-led brand

MrQ runs under the domain account 60629, Tek Fox Ltd, holding remote casino operating licence 060629-R-337532-004. Tek Fox is a smaller licensee than LC International or Hillside, and MrQ’s catalogue reflects that: a tighter slot selection, a small number of live tables, and a promotions calendar that prizes simplicity. The reload offers MrQ runs tend to be modest in headline size but light on the conditions that make a reload expensive to clear — fewer game restrictions, no mixed-product bonus, and the wagering at the 10x cap.

A MrQ reload at the same £20 deposit is, in headline terms, smaller than a Ladbrokes or a Paddy Power offer, but the simplicity is the point. A player who wants to know exactly what a bonus costs before claiming it finds MrQ’s terms easier to read than the longer marketing copy at the larger brands. MrQ is the clear winner for transparency; the smaller headline bonus is essentially the price paid for straightforward, easy-to-understand conditions.

4. Coral — the same licence, a different loyalty entry point

Coral features under the domain account 54743, LC International Limited, with remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. It shares its licence with Ladbrokes and Gala Bingo, and the reload offers follow the same broad shape: a percentage match on a low-deposit trigger, wagering at the 10x cap, slots-only.

The Coral entry point is its loyalty programme, which is the largest in the LC International group by member count. A reload that lands inside the Coral loyalty tier can carry a slightly different match percentage to the same brand’s headline offer, and the cadence is set by the loyalty programme rather than the operator’s weekly promotion. The verdict for a player already in Coral’s loyalty scheme: the reload is the same regulated offer as the rest of the group, with the loyalty tier as the multiplier on the headline match.

5. bet365 — the largest catalogue and the broadest reload terms

bet365 maintains a presence under the domain account 55149, Hillside (UK Gaming) ENC, with remote casino operating licence 055149-R-331499-004. It is the largest casino brand on the register by catalogue size and by member count, and the reload offers reflect that scale: a wider range of percentage matches, more frequent reload windows, and the broadest game restrictions in the featured set. The wagering is at the 10x cap, as it has to be; the deposit trigger is in the standard low-deposit band.

A bet365 reload is, in practice, the most configurable offer on the page — the player has more deposit sizes to choose from, more reload windows to land in, and more game categories to clear the wagering in. The configurability is the feature, and the feature is the cost: a player who picks the wrong game category can find a reload harder to clear than it looks. For those wanting the most options and who don’t mind navigating complex terms, bet365 provides the widest range available here, though that breadth requires careful reading.

6. Betfred — the retail-rooted reload cadence

Betfred operates through domain account 39544, Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited, using remote casino operating licence 039544-R-319290-010. The brand’s roots are in retail bookmaking, and the reload cadence reflects that history: promotions tied to specific events, a weekly reload window, and a smaller catalogue of slots than the larger online-only brands. The reload offers at Betfred tend to be event-anchored, with the percentage match and the qualifying deposit calibrated to the event rather than to the calendar week.

A Betfred reload at the standard £10-or-more deposit trigger is comparable in headline size to the other major brands, with the wagering at the 10x cap. The event anchor is what changes from week to week. Betfred is uniquely positioned for players preferring reload offers tied to specific sporting or seasonal events; the smaller catalogue here is simply the trade-off for having more focused, event-specific promotions.

7. Casumo — the explorer-style loyalty reload

Casumo uses the domain account 61549, Recro Limited, and carries remote casino operating licence 061549-R-336718-002. Recro is a smaller licensee than the LC International or Hillside groups, but Casumo’s promotional engine is one of the more distinctive in the featured set: a loyalty programme built around progression and unlockable rewards rather than tiered cashback. The reload offers at Casumo are layered into that loyalty frame — a returning player gets a different shape of reload than a brand that runs a straight weekly match.

A Casumo reload at a £20 deposit is comparable in headline size to the major brands, with the wagering at the 10x cap. The loyalty progression is what differentiates the offer: a reload at a higher loyalty tier carries a different match percentage to the same brand’s headline offer. Casumo’s system rewards long-term engagement rather than one-off weekend boosts, making it the right pick for players who prefer a sustained loyalty arc.

8. 888casino — the established cross-channel reload

888casino operates under domain account 39028, 888 UK Limited, holding remote casino operating licence 039028-R-319297-014. The licence tenure is among the longest in the featured set, and the brand carries a cross-channel promotional frame: a reload offer can be part of a wider promotion that also touches 888sport, with the wagering on the casino portion kept inside the 10x cap.

An 888casino reload at the standard deposit trigger is comparable in headline size to the major brands, with the wagering at the 10x cap and the game restrictions narrower than bet365’s. The cross-channel anchor is what changes from promotion to promotion. The verdict for a player who plays across 888’s brands: 888casino’s reload is the casino half of a wider promotional frame, and the cross-channel shape is the trade-off for the narrower game restrictions.

9. Jackpotjoy — the bingo-rooted reload frame

Jackpotjoy utilizes domain account 38905, Gamesys Operations Limited, under remote casino operating licence 038905-R-319430-022. The brand’s roots are in online bingo, and the catalogue reflects that: a strong bingo lobby, a smaller slots selection, and a promotions calendar that prizes cadence over headline size. The reload offers at Jackpotjoy tend to be smaller in headline terms than the major casino brands, but the cadence is tighter — a returning player gets a reload window more often.

A Jackpotjoy reload at a £10 deposit is smaller in headline terms than a Ladbrokes or bet365 reload at the same trigger, but the wagering is at the 10x cap and the game restrictions are narrower. The verdict for a player who plays more frequently and wants a reload that matches the cadence: Jackpotjoy’s smaller offer is paid for by the higher frequency, and the tighter restrictions are what makes the higher cadence affordable.

10. Gala Bingo — the third LC International brand

Gala Bingo is listed on the register as an active domain of account 54743, LC International Limited, under remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. It shares its licence with Ladbrokes and Coral, and the reload offers follow the same broad shape: a percentage match on a low-deposit trigger, wagering at the 10x cap, with the game restrictions tighter than the major casino brands.

A Gala Bingo reload at a £10 deposit is in the same headline band as the rest of the LC International group, with the wagering at the 10x cap. The bingo-led catalogue is what differentiates the offer: a player who plays bingo gets a reload frame calibrated to that catalogue, with the casino slots treated as a secondary surface. Gala Bingo is the primary choice within the LC International group for fans of bingo-centric sites, though the shared-licence constraints mean it cannot diverge significantly from its sibling brands in terms of core mechanics.

Reading the ten in one frame

Across the ten featured brands, the deposit trigger sits in the £10-or-more band at every operator, the wagering sits at or below the 10x cap by regulation, and the game restrictions vary from tight (MrQ, Jackpotjoy) to broad (bet365). Three of the brands (Ladbrokes, Coral, Gala Bingo) sit on the same licence and the same promotions engine. The catalogue size ranges from the small (MrQ, Jackpotjoy) to the largest on the register (bet365). What differs brand to brand is the headline match, the cadence, and the loyalty frame around the offer — not the regulatory cage any of them sit in.

The comparison below puts those differences on one page.

Every licence number above is verifiable on the Gambling Commission’s public register. Every reload offer shape above is what research identifies for the brand — not a recommendation.

The fundamentals of a reload bonus

The shelves above have laid out the regulatory cage, the funding rules, the cost arithmetic, and the brand-by-brand comparison. The fundamentals belong together in one frame because they are what a player acts on.

A reload bonus is a gambling promotion tied to a deposit by an existing account holder. It is, in regulatory terms, the same kind of offer as a welcome bonus, with the same cap on wagering, the same restrictions on credit-card funding, the same GAMSTOP and age checks. What it is not, despite the marketing language, is “free”: the wagering requirement, even at the 10x cap, demands a turnover of ten times the bonus before any of it is withdrawable, and the time cost of that turnover is what the marketing line does not name.

The deposit that triggers a reload sits in the £10-or-more band at every GB-licensed brand featured here. That is the regulatory floor in practice, even where a brand does not advertise it as such. The wagering at the 10x cap is the regulatory ceiling, and no GB-licensed brand can exceed it.

The cost of clearing a reload is the cost this page is built around. A £20 reload at 10x demands £200 of turnover, which is roughly 40 spins at the £5 slot stake ceiling for an adult. A £50 reload at 10x demands £500, which is 100 spins. A £100 reload at 10x demands £1,000, which is 200 spins. None of those figures is the value of the bonus; all of them are the time and money the bonus costs before any of it is withdrawable.

The reload cadence — how often a player can claim — varies by brand. Paddy Power and Betfred run weekly or event-anchored reloads. Jackpotjoy runs a tighter cadence. MrQ and Casumo run reloads inside a loyalty frame that changes the match by tier. The common thread is that the reload is designed to be claimed again, and the cost is in the repetition.

What the catalogue looks like beyond the ten

The Commission’s register is wider than this article. As of 18 September 2026, it recorded 139 businesses with active remote casino licences, with 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries beneath them. The ten brands featured here are sampled from that register, not the whole of it. Many other licensed reload operators exist; the comparison on this page is the comparison the article can stand behind, not the comparison the GB-licensed market contains.

Frequently asked questions

The questions below are the ones a returning player meets when a reload offer lands in their inbox. The answers draw on the Gambling Commission’s public register, the wagering cap in force since 19 December 2025, and the funding rules that govern every GB-licensed reload deposit.

What is a casino reload bonus and how does it differ from a welcome offer?

A reload bonus is a promotion tied to a deposit by an existing account holder, while a welcome bonus is tied to the first deposit or the first series of deposits after sign-up. The regulatory treatment is identical — both count as gambling promotions, both are capped at 10x wagering under the rules in force from 19 December 2025, and both share the credit-card funding ban and the GAMSTOP requirement. The difference is timing and repetition: a reload is designed to be claimed again, often weekly or monthly, where a welcome offer is a one-time entry.

How often can I claim a reload bonus at a UK casino?

The frequency is set by the operator, not the regulator. The featured brands on this page run reloads on a weekly, monthly or event-anchored cadence, with some loyalty programmes layering additional reloads inside a tier structure. The credit-card ban and the 10x wagering cap apply to every claim; the cadence itself is the operator’s commercial decision. A player who claims a reload every week is, over a year, running twelve times the cost-of-clearing of a single claim.

Do crypto-funded reload bonuses work the same way as card deposits?

The funding rules are the same: no credit card, including a credit card routed through an e-wallet, can fund gambling in Great Britain under the ban in force since 14 April 2020. A crypto-funded reload at a GB-licensed casino is processed under the same identity verification, the same age check, and the same 10x wagering cap as a debit-card reload. The Faster Payments rails, the Apple Pay tokenisation, and the AstroPay e-money authorisation are all alternatives to a credit card; none of them is a substitute for the regulatory cage that sits on top of the deposit.

What wagering requirement applies to reload bonuses under current UK rules?

A 10x cap, in force since 19 December 2025. The cap applies to every GB-licensed reload bonus, and a brand cannot run a higher multiple even if it wanted to. Mixed-product bonuses — for example, a sports bet that pays out in casino spins — were banned in the same package, so a reload cannot carry a wagering requirement inherited from a non-casino product either. The 10x figure is the ceiling, not the floor: many offers run lower, but none can run higher.

Is there a minimum deposit needed to unlock a reload bonus?

Yes, and it sits in the £10-or-more band at every GB-licensed brand featured on this page. The minimum is the deposit trigger written into the offer, not a regulatory minimum, but the practical minimum across the featured set converges on £10. A deposit below the trigger forfeits the bonus; a deposit above it activates the offer on the full deposit, with the bonus matched against the qualifying amount.

Can I withdraw reload bonus winnings straight away?

Not until the wagering requirement is cleared. A £20 reload at the 10x cap requires £200 of turnover before any of the bonus is withdrawable; a £50 reload requires £500; a £100 reload requires £1,000. The turnover is the cost the marketing line does not name, and the time cost of clearing it is what the regulatory cage — the 2.5-second spin floor, the £5 stake ceiling for adults — sets the band for. A reload promotion that asks the player to deposit twice in a week is a reload whose true wagering cost is two turnover windows back to back, and that is the cost a player should weigh before claiming.